<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The lifespan of blog outreach &#8220;specialists&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shinyred.co.uk/343/the-lifespan-of-blog-outreach-specialists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shinyred.co.uk/343/the-lifespan-of-blog-outreach-specialists/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:12:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiny Red</title>
		<link>http://www.shinyred.co.uk/343/the-lifespan-of-blog-outreach-specialists/comment-page-1/#comment-12948</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiny Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shinyred.tv/2008/02/13/the-lifespan-of-blog-outreach-specialists/#comment-12948</guid>
		<description>Thanks Melanie, I think there&#039;s definitely something to be said in not being precious about who pitches &quot;blogger x&quot; for &quot;story y&quot;. After all, the value that digital specialists can provide their clients isn&#039;t limited to being more likely to evoke a response or a story. If the blogger outreach function is commoditised or taken in-house, both of which still seem a while off - at least in the UK - PR agencies will again have to react and adapt to this in order to continue adding value beyond the tactical execution of pitching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Melanie, I think there&#8217;s definitely something to be said in not being precious about who pitches &#8220;blogger x&#8221; for &#8220;story y&#8221;. After all, the value that digital specialists can provide their clients isn&#8217;t limited to being more likely to evoke a response or a story. If the blogger outreach function is commoditised or taken in-house, both of which still seem a while off &#8211; at least in the UK &#8211; PR agencies will again have to react and adapt to this in order to continue adding value beyond the tactical execution of pitching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Seasons</title>
		<link>http://www.shinyred.co.uk/343/the-lifespan-of-blog-outreach-specialists/comment-page-1/#comment-12943</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Seasons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shinyred.tv/2008/02/13/the-lifespan-of-blog-outreach-specialists/#comment-12943</guid>
		<description>Hi Lewis,

Thanks so much for your thoughts.  I should have noted (and perhaps I will go back and edit) that this is all based on the idea that how we pitch to blogger won&#039;t change all that much. 

While it&#039;s true that there will always be a need for external agencies, I believe that blog outreach will become more and more a part of the client-side or traditional-side of the outreach.  Right now that&#039;s starting to be the case, but most non-specialists really don&#039;t have it down yet. They&#039;re going to get better though, and I see them saying in a few years time &quot;Hey!  We&#039;ve been doing this for a few years, we have relationships, we have results... Why are we paying someone outside to do it for us?&quot;  The non-specialist will become the specialist.

The only reason I see for going external in this not-so-distant future is that it saves time, which I&#039;m not exactly comfortable with as what could be the only safety net of the day-to-day practice.   

I think you&#039;re right in saying that it is and will continue to be part of the digital PR practitioner&#039;s job to advise on what&#039;s next and how to develop the best digital campaign possible.  But if, in the future, the playing field ends up evening out in terms of who can pitch whom - whether it&#039;s through bloggers saying &quot;no&quot; to PR or just everyone learning how to do it well - the best idea is going to win, and it may not matter as much who&#039;s had the relationship with the blogger the longest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lewis,</p>
<p>Thanks so much for your thoughts.  I should have noted (and perhaps I will go back and edit) that this is all based on the idea that how we pitch to blogger won&#8217;t change all that much. </p>
<p>While it&#8217;s true that there will always be a need for external agencies, I believe that blog outreach will become more and more a part of the client-side or traditional-side of the outreach.  Right now that&#8217;s starting to be the case, but most non-specialists really don&#8217;t have it down yet. They&#8217;re going to get better though, and I see them saying in a few years time &#8220;Hey!  We&#8217;ve been doing this for a few years, we have relationships, we have results&#8230; Why are we paying someone outside to do it for us?&#8221;  The non-specialist will become the specialist.</p>
<p>The only reason I see for going external in this not-so-distant future is that it saves time, which I&#8217;m not exactly comfortable with as what could be the only safety net of the day-to-day practice.   </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right in saying that it is and will continue to be part of the digital PR practitioner&#8217;s job to advise on what&#8217;s next and how to develop the best digital campaign possible.  But if, in the future, the playing field ends up evening out in terms of who can pitch whom &#8211; whether it&#8217;s through bloggers saying &#8220;no&#8221; to PR or just everyone learning how to do it well &#8211; the best idea is going to win, and it may not matter as much who&#8217;s had the relationship with the blogger the longest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
